The True Cost of Everything I Owned—And What I Gained by Giving It Away
The sky above Taos, New Mexico deepens to indigo as Ira Wolf's melodies drift through our circle of vans. I'm playing bartender, pouring beers for strangers who've quickly become something closer to kin. As I hand a craft IPA to a woman who left her corporate life to spend weekends in a converted Sprinter, I'm struck by the paradox unfolding around me: these people have found profound richness by choosing to have less.
The Invisible Weight
After college, I stood in my apartment surrounded by evidence of my participation in consumer culture. Shelves of unread books. Drawers of unused gadgets. Closets of unworn clothes. Each item represented not just a purchase but a promise—that this thing would finally make me happier, more productive, more admired.
My growing library revealed the pattern most clearly. I wasn't buying knowledge but the aspiration of knowledge. Those unread volumes weren't sources of wisdom but quiet reminders of unfulfilled intentions. The ease of acquisition had masked the true cost of ownership. These possessions occupied not just physical space but mental bandwidth—each carrying the invisible burden of maintenance, justification, and attention.
I remembered my high school English teacher's parting gift: a poem containing the line, "The only things we keep are the things we give away." Surrounded by my accumulated belongings, those words finally resonated.
The Liberation of Less
The decision arrived with unexpected clarity: I would keep only what fit in a suitcase and duffel bag. Everything else had to go.
I texted friends and posted online, watching as items once central to my identity found new homes. With each departure, I felt a counterintuitive expansion rather than loss. The space—both physical and mental—previously occupied by these things was reclaimed.
Then came the most radical step: giving away my car to a friend's brother who needed it more than I did. This wasn't just downsizing—it was completely reimagining my relationship with possessions. I embraced the philosophy that objects should flow toward those who truly need them. If something disappeared from my life, it must have found someone who needed it more.
Economists would recognize my previous reluctance to part with possessions as classic loss aversion—our tendency to feel the pain of losing something more acutely than the pleasure of gaining something of equal value. Scott Galloway explains in The Four how Amazon has mastered tapping into our ancient acquisition instincts, creating a nearly frictionless pathway between desire and purchase that bypasses rational assessment. My overstuffed apartment was evidence of this manipulation.
Letting go meant confronting the sunk cost fallacy—continuing a behavior based on previously invested resources. Those unread books represented not just their purchase price but a vision of myself I was reluctant to abandon.
Howl and the Open Road
With minimal possessions and no permanent address, I purchased a used conversion van in Salt Lake City, named him Howl, and embraced a new freedom. The journey that followed created a series of experiences conventional life could never have offered.
My travels took me through Colorado and Texas, to North Carolina and New York, and eventually to Canada. In New York City, I parked among Hasidic Jewish neighborhoods and joined an Airbnb experience that granted rare access to spaces typically closed to outsiders—entering buildings where traditionally only men are permitted and witnessing domestic life in a tight-knit religious community.
I curated intellectual experiences as deliberately as geographic ones. At Alain de Botton's School of Life conference, I absorbed philosophical frameworks for examining the good life. At Tony Robbins' "Unleash the Power Within" event, I witnessed people walking on hot coals and breaking through perceived limitations. At Rachel Hollis' conference in South Carolina, I encountered yet another approach to personal development.
What fascinated me wasn't the content itself—much of which contradicted—but the diverse approaches to the universal quest for meaning. These weren't just events but field studies in how different communities construct purpose.
The most profound moments were often the simplest: rain drumming on the van's roof, creating a cocoon of calm in a metal shell. Or the terrifying night in Yellowstone when winds threatened to rock Howl off his wheels—a humbling reminder of nature's power—followed by the majestic sight of buffalo grazing at dawn.
Clarity Through Reduction
Without the buffer of excess, I confronted myself directly. In magnificent national parks, I discovered my discomfort with solitude. My mind, accustomed to constant stimulation, rebelled against silence.
Driving through America's poorest counties opened my eyes to economic realities I'd only read about: front yards dotted with broken-down vehicles, economies built around pawn shops and casinos. These weren't statistics anymore but communities where real people lived.
I moved between worlds with unprecedented freedom—sleeping in freezing Canadian temperatures one week, staying with a multimillionaire the next. This contrast created a perspective impossible to gain from stationary life.
The impact of minimalism manifested in measurable mental changes:
- Decision fatigue vanished. Without constant choices about which possessions to use, my mental energy was preserved for meaningful decisions.
- Present-moment awareness sharpened. I noticed details previously missed—the quality of light in different regions, distinct smells of places, subtle emotions crossing strangers' faces.
- Background anxiety quieted. The constant hum of obligation that accompanies ownership—maintenance, storage, insurance—had disappeared.
- Creativity flourished. Ideas came more readily and with greater clarity, as if mental bandwidth previously occupied by possessions had been reallocated.
- Adaptability strengthened. With fewer buffers between myself and experience, I developed greater resilience.
In behavioral economics terms, I had escaped the "endowment effect"—our tendency to overvalue things simply because we own them. Breaking free from this cycle created unprecedented mental clarity.
Finding Value in Service
At the van life gathering in Taos, my most fulfilling moments came from serving others—pouring drinks, facilitating connections, listening to stories. This simple act provided more immediate satisfaction than any purchase ever had.
The vanlifers I met weren't defined by traditional success markers but by experiences, stories, and their courage to reimagine what a well-lived life could look like. This contrasted sharply with what Galloway describes as the "religion of consumption" that Amazon has helped create. Stepping outside this system revealed meaning-making mechanisms entirely divorced from acquisition.
The Unfiltered Reality
Van life isn't perfect. The romanticized Instagram version omits searches for public bathrooms, feelings of rootlessness, and the vulnerability of mechanical breakdowns far from help. Yet these contrasts—comfort and discomfort, fear and wonder, solitude and connection—create a richness that homogenized, comfortable living rarely delivers.
Away from algorithmic manipulation and constant advertising, my consumption patterns fundamentally changed. I observed how status quo bias—our tendency to prefer things as they are—had kept me tethered to possessions and patterns that didn't serve me. The default settings of modern American life aren't neutral; they're deliberately engineered to increase consumption.
On the road, with limited space and connectivity, I inadvertently created what behavioral economists call "friction"—additional steps that force conscious decision-making. Each potential purchase faced a profound question: "Is this worth the space it will occupy in my limited home?"
The Return With New Vision
Most of us eventually return to more conventional living arrangements and begin accumulating possessions again. But those who've experienced the clarity of minimalism rarely return to mindless consumption.
The fundamental question changes from "Can I afford this?" to "Is this worth the space it will occupy in my life?" This shift transforms your relationship with the material world. Amazon's same-day delivery loses its allure when you recognize each purchase as a commitment of limited life energy.
This perspective aligns with what researchers call "opportunity cost neglect"—our tendency to ignore what we give up when making choices. Every possession demands maintenance, mental bandwidth, and sometimes worry. Recognizing these hidden costs changes the equation of ownership.
You don't need to live in a van to benefit from this clarity. The principles can be applied anywhere through regular purges of unused possessions, thoughtful consideration before new acquisitions, valuing experiences over things, creating physical space that promotes mental space, and questioning the automatic equation of acquisition with improvement.
A Different Success Metric
Our culture measures success through accumulation—money, status, possessions, achievements. Minimalism offers a different metric: the quality of your attention and capacity for presence.
By this measure, success looks like fully engaging with whatever you're doing, freedom from the constant desire for more, mental space for creativity and connection, alignment between values and actions, and flexibility to adapt to inevitable changes.
What began as an experiment in alternative living became a profound lesson in how possessions shape consciousness. The less I owned, the more clearly I could see. And what I saw most clearly was that what we think we own often ends up owning us.
That realization—gained through rainstorms and buffalo sightings, Hasidic neighborhoods and self-improvement conferences—was worth the price of admission: a clearer mind, achieved by leaving almost everything behind.
Member discussion