How Can You Tell Whether an A/B Testing Case Study Is Trustworthy?
Evaluate any A/B testing case study with a 12-point evidence checklist covering source, sample, metrics, stopping, SRM, limitations, and transfer.
Articles exploring framework through the lens of behavioral science and experimentation. Practical frameworks for growth leaders who measure in revenue, not vanity metrics.
9articles
Evaluate any A/B testing case study with a 12-point evidence checklist covering source, sample, metrics, stopping, SRM, limitations, and transfer.
See four A/B testing examples graded by evidence quality, with missing data, limits, transferable lessons, and safer next-test plans.
A clean merge isn't proof it's correct. Here's how to investigate what changed on each side — and the one conflict type worth refusing to auto-resolve.
The AI that wrote your draft is the worst reviewer of it. Here's the independent-review technique that catches what a second read-through misses.
Most people accept an AI agent’s first answer. A three-layer audit — primary-source check, realistic-input test, goal re-derivation — catches what pattern-matching misses.
Karpathy's 2023 LLM talk, rebuilt for 2026 — what changed in scaling, tool use, and security, and what founders deploying AI agents need to know.
One honest experiment result can get a growth program funded or gutted. The fix isn't better reporting — it's pre-registration, borrowed from clinical trials.
Most marketing copy is bad in ways that are research-documented. Present tense beats past tense (Packard, Berger, Boghrati 2023).
A five-step framework for connecting experiment decisions to revenue assumptions, implementation quality, and post-test evidence.